All Activity

It's how I get a sizeable portion of my submission points! 😁

Pete - I have been adding books over the past several weeks/months and do content updates almost every week. As @Steven L. Dasingeralso noted, the process broke at some point in the past and won't start again. Hopefully this can get figured out and fixed.

@Steven L. DasingerPete's wondering if you can message him on Slack with the steps to reproduce the problem.

Delete or Rename Bk 1.jpg to 1.jpg and Bk 1-LE.jpg to 1-LE.jpg From: Pictures\B\Berkley\Empire (Berkley) Delete or Rename FCBD 2024.jpt to FCBD 2024-A.jpg From: Pictures\P\Papercutz\Free Comic Book Day (Papercutz)

I have the same problem. Once this process 'breaks' (stops working (not sure why)) it never starts working again. After Content updates,it only shows the date of that update. There is no history.

The trigger to writing a new entry in value log is the content update--it's not just any change to the database. So, for instance, if you added a bunch of books on 4/12, they wouldn't show up in the value history until you downloaded the 4/17 content update (in the value history--obviously, they show up in the database itself immediately). -Pete

Similar to the Overall Title field you can use under Title information, would it be possible to have something under storylines that would let you pull up all issues from a crossover? For instance, Marvel ran Contest of Chaos across many of its 2023 Annuals, so in theory you would be able to click on the Overall Storyline to pull up all issues from the crossover. I'm not sure if there would be a way to differentiate between tie-in issues and and issues that are directly part of the crossover, but that would be great too. Thanks!

thanks for the info. will run it past our programming team to be looked into.

No, not "never." The folks at Human Computing don't always know about release date delays, so I suspect that they are dependent on CB users to submit updates/corrections for many of them (thus Mark's statement that "they get corrected over time").

So they're never updated after the initial solicitation?

Here is screenshot. The farthest back I can select for value history is always today.

we plug in street dates provided by our distributors with their initial monthly solicitations. However, Publisher delays can cause delays that we don't know about (they get corrected over time).

So does CB not keep up with street dates anymore? It's understandable in regards to all the indie stuff, but I'm talking about Marvel.

@Mark J. Castaneda I ran a Collection overview for books, magazines, and comics, and none of them display cover images, however, the auto-generated collection overviews for all three categories display cover images. I also ran item checklists of series I own with "items in my collection " checked for all three categories and they also do not have any cover images when looking at the reports under My Comics. However the cover images do appear if you do preview of the report.

@Andrew d’Entremont Outside of the 'Collection Report' style, are you noticing any other report style with similar cover problems?

OK. I only had the cover to go by. Isn't it fun when the cover and indicia don't match?

I just ran a collection report for comics and I am also getting covers. It's only Books and Magazines that won't display covers when running a report and using the Save to Web function.

amazon links should not be there. will remove

that stuff shouldn't be there... someone got past our gargoyles and must have slipped them in through a user submission. Will remove

the indicia of Land Left Behind has no word 'The' in it.

Weird... i'm able to get covers with a Collection Report for Comic Books but not Magazines. Can you confirm @Andrew d’Entremont the same result on your end?

Can you screenshot (or email us at support@comicbase.com) what you're referring to? We're having a hard time visualizing what you're seeing.

I would like to suggest in between raw grade selections. I know its customizable and I can add them to myself, but I'd wouldn't mind seeing these as a standard. GD/VG VG/FN FN/VF Or perhaps a little more granular. GD- GD+ VG- VG+ FN- FN+ VF- VF+ Thanks for the consideration.

Sure thing. The search function can be rather unforgiving compared to something like Google.

Well as Homer would say "DOH!" Thanks