Michael Jacobson Posted April 17, 2021 Share Posted April 17, 2021 Unknown Items in my latest update brought this to my attention. Lady Pendragon Vol.1 has an Ashcan 1 that seems to be identical to Ashcan 2 and 2-B under Lady Pendragon Vol.2. The indicia reads "Lady Pendragon Vol. 2 Prelude", so the Vol. 1 Ashcan and the Vol. 2 Ashcan 2-B should be deleted. Additionally, Vol.2 #1-2nd printing seems to be the same as Vol.1 #1-2nd Printing. The Vol.2 entry should be deleted. While we are on the subject of Vol.2, 1-C and 1-F appear to be the same issue. Issue 1-F should be deleted. Now, onto Lady Pendragon Vol.3 (you thought I forgot, didn't you?). Bk 1 contains material from Vol.1 , Vol.2 and the Cover Gallery one-shot, but nothing from Vol.3. It should be moved to Lady Pendragon Vol.2, since it contains that complete run of issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory Hecht Posted April 17, 2021 Share Posted April 17, 2021 6 hours ago, Michael E. Jacobson said: Bk 1 contains material from Vol.1 , Vol.2 and the Cover Gallery one-shot, but nothing from Vol.3. It should be moved to Lady Pendragon Vol.2, since it contains that complete run of issues. How much material from vol. 1 is contained in Book 1? Does it make more sense to spin out Book 1 into its own title if it contains material from three different database titles (vol 1, vol 2, and the cover gallery one-shot)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Jacobson Posted April 17, 2021 Author Share Posted April 17, 2021 Well, Vol.1 is just one issue. Vol.2 is a three issue mini-series. I don't think Book 1 warrants it's own entry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory Hecht Posted April 17, 2021 Share Posted April 17, 2021 Typically ComicBase will list collected editions under their own title if they include issues from multiple titles (even if those titles are only a single issue). Mark will make the final determination, of course, but it sounds to me like the book in question would be a candidate for its own, separate title based on past practice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now