Fred Slota Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 Ummmmmm... my head hurts. There are 10 covers with a background map image, each map segment shows one of the 10 realms War of the Realms 1/A, 2/B, 3/C, 4/C, 5/B, 6/B War of the Realms: Journey into Mystery 1/A War of the Realms: New Agents of Atlas 1/B War of the Realms: Punisher 1/C War of the Realms: Uncanny X-Men 1/A The map appears to be similar to the image I found at https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Glossary:Ten_Realms The covers appear to fit together as this 10-ptych, left-to-right, top-to-bottom? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Sternberg Posted March 4 Share Posted March 4 Do they really form a cohesive picture together, or are they just thematically the same? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred Slota Posted March 5 Author Share Posted March 5 My assessment is, yes. Past connecting images haven't always exactly matched up at the edges, there are sometimes small gaps between the images. The background is definitely a single image; I provided a link to a site with a version of that image. This appears to be the first connected image I know of that doesn't make a solid rectangle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven L. Dasinger Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 According to a video I found, one cover is out of place. The War of the Realm #6/B (with Captain Marvel) down to the last lower right 'box'. This creates the illusion of a tree. The bottom 3 being the roots, the single one above the trunk and the 6 at the top being the branches/leaves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred Slota Posted March 5 Author Share Posted March 5 Thank you. Looking closer, 6/B does connect to 5/B, not WotR:New Agents of Atlas 1/B. I had put too much trust in the fandom wiki image of the map, which located Muspelheim above the roots, and thus I thought the tree-part on the top of the 6/B cover was a continuation of the branch on Atlas 1/B. A closer look at the two covers shows that the map has been drawn differently, Muspelheim in this presentation is being drawn under the roots, and the tree-part on the top of the 6/B cover is a continuation of the roots on 5/B. Regardless of this cover's positioning, we're all in agreement that this is still a 10-ptych, despite it not forming a complete rectangular collage, yes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred Slota Posted March 12 Author Share Posted March 12 10-ptych it will be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now